Monthly Archives: February 2012

Oecumene and engaging with research as media

Just back from an exhilarating two-days at the ‘Opening the Boundaries of Citizenship’ conference, hosted by the Oecumene research project, at the Open University. I saw first hand at this event how research can work as a powerful medium for organizing forms of collective sociability. I say organizing here, because this was an occasion where well over 200 people convened face-to-face (from around the world) to address a set of emerging issues related to the study and practice of citizenship. It was a wonderfully choreographed performance in its own right. A packed programme of keynotes, coffee breaks, introductions, corridors, walkways, lunches and receptions were insightfully planned and staged so as to bring this gathering to life in an incredibly free-flowing and lively way. This was also helped along of course by the highly committed group of people who were in attendance.

This experience has encouraged me to further consider the relationship between the process of generating new forms of conceptual apparatus and the process of mediating these conceptual apparatus through forms of (not always public) performance. In this context, I was less led to dwell on how forms of knowledge production are being – or could be – re-distributed (spatially) or in terms of resources. The two-days instead made me start to think more about how different kinds of concept building processes and performances of research work with time.

I had come to view Oecumene as a research project working, first and foremost, in a long-term, even a generational (temporal) register. This may have been partly because, as a project and through the research and individual and collective thinking it supports, Oecumene is – in important ways – up-ending, re-working and renewing understandings of citizenship that have dominated occidental political theory for generations.  By witnessing at this conference just some of the sheer quantity and heterogeneity of ways that this very wide ranging project is nourishing forms of ‘live’ research across multiple contexts of contemporary practice, I now begin to see more clearly how this research process is nevertheless also engaging with/in time in a array of other ways – simultaneously. As the conference illuminated, the concept of citizenship is being reworked – directly or less directly – through a dazzling range of projects and processes in a spectrum of contexts of practice, contexts of thinking and contexts of public as well as more academic debate.

The Creating Publics project looks forward to engaging with members of the Oecumene team to discuss these issues in more detail in the months ahead. The Creating Publics project will certainly need to do this if it is to develop a clearer perspective on how social science research might be performed as a time-based media that can support processes of public creation.  The Highrise project, showcased at this conference, illustrates – in wonderfully concrete as well as imaginative and suggestive ways – some of the possibilities of online interactive media for social research and public creation. It also presents a robust challenge to instrumental and linear engagement agendas.

However, as Shannon Jackson cautions:

“Our evaluations of work depend not only upon critical histories but also on disciplinary perceptual habits that can make for drastically different understandings of what we are in fact encountering. Perceptions of stasis and durationality, passivity and activity, stillness and action, might well be in the eye (and body) of the beholder. I would wager that the socio-political sense of what we are encountering will differ as well.” (p.4, ‘Social Works: performing art, supporting publics’ (2011) Routledge)

Amongst the many issues in play here therefore, once research begins to be engaged with as a public media, are those of: how ‘researchers’ might be able to tune the perceptual as well as the performative apparatus they use to interact, communicate and publicise; how to craft (and choose between) ways of experimenting publicly in/with time; how ‘new’ concepts and forms of practice emerge in different ways, in different contexts, over and through time through processes of social research; and, how research can mediate relationships between publicity, new ways of thinking and the creation of new publics. There are lots of issues to unpick and talk through here related to the public iterability of social research, many of which I’m hoping the Creating Publics project can continue to work on. Thankfully, besides the work showcased at the Oecumene conference, there’s also lot’s more going on in this area (see for example the forthcoming ‘i-docs’ symposium  in Bristol which will be ‘interrogating the field of interactive doumentary’ and Mandy Rose’s excellent Collab Docs blog for more).

Tagged ,

‘Occupy Publishing’

Beginning to catch up on more of the recent debates about ‘open access’ publishing (for another thoughtful discussion on this, see here; see also here). In relation to the Creating Publics project these debates highlight issues about the mediation and control of the means of publicity; as well as set of perennial questions around the construction of academic authority, public reputation and ‘quality’. Given the links increasingly being forged in these discussions with repertoires of contemporary global activism, these debates can also be situated amongst a wider set of political discussions (see for example here) about relationships between knowledge production, publicness and ‘public’ ownership and control. If the pressure to change orthodox academic publishing practices continues to build, so the pressure to prototype and test-out new publishing models will also increase. In this context, it becomes more be important for the Creating Publics project to reflect on some of the varied ways that emerging experiments in this area imagine and go about working to mediate/create the publics of academic publishing; as well as how such experiments might be taken up, negotiated or resisted by existing players and publics in this field. The idea of ‘occupying’ publishing is very suggestive in and of itself, not least in terms of how the space of publishing and publicity is being imagined in this formulation.

Tagged , , ,